Until the enterprise handwheel became criterion sometime inwards the 1930s (I believe), Singer made spoked handwheels or "balance wheels," equally they were together with thus known.
I'm guessing they phased them out for both practical together with security reasons. Spoked handwheels were heftier than their enterprise successors, together with the extra majority provided momentum that in all likelihood came inwards handy when machines were hand-cranked together with treadle-powered; the advent of electrical motors obviated that need. As far equally safety, if a fry or careless operator stuck their fingers betwixt the spokes spell the machine was running at high speed, the results would in all likelihood receive got been unpleasant.
Here are 3 dissimilar types of spoked handwheel you're liable to come upwardly across:
![]() |
Left, replica. Center, Singer master 5.5". Right, Singer master 6". |
![]() |
Original Singer 5.5" |
It's got ix spokes together with measures almost 5 inches inwards diameter.
Assuming my kitchen scale is accurate, it weighs inwards at nearly 1 lb. 10 ozs, or 732 grams for those of y'all on the metric organisation who can't move bothered to fool amongst our featherbrained ounces.
Below is a modern-day replica of the handwheel above, this ane made inwards China. It's slowly to discovery at a sewing machine parts supplier.
![]() |
Replica 5.5" |
The diameter is but almost identical to the original.
It's but a shade heftier at 1 lb. xi ozs.
I genuinely dislike this handwheel. Although it serves its role good enough, the manufacturing lineament of it does non sit down good amongst me. Up until the 1950s together with arguably the '60s, Singer was known for making the best materials to exact manufacturing tolerances. If y'all await at the spokes on the replica handwheel, they're sloppily cast together with receive got abrupt edges. Additionally, the pigment is bubbled, uneven together with rough, despite the glossy finish.
![]() |
Sharp edges on the spokes. Tsk, tsk |
What genuinely drives me nuts almost the replica is that the bore is off-center. Take a look:
![]() |
Replica bore |
Now compare that to the master Singer handwheel's bore:
![]() |
Original Singer bore |
When I await at the Singer handwheel spinning on a machine, there's no wobble together with the tolerances are perfect. That makes me happy, together with proud to move working on such a finely-constructed machine. I realize that this is because I'm to a greater extent than hung upwardly on the machines than the actual sewing, together with that if y'all were sewing a projection on a machine outfitted amongst a replica handwheel, y'all would non notice the difference. Nevertheless, I volition non buy a replica handwheel ane time again because I don't desire to back upwardly that form of imprecise manufacturing. As a old production designer I loathe junk together with I genuinely fille well-manufactured American goods, which is business office of why I dear old Singers thus much.
I volition grudgingly acknowledge that the 3 benefits of a replica handwheel are 1) they're slowly to discovery a supplier of, 2) they're affordable, together with 3) they're slightly chunkier than the original, which may experience a combat ameliorate inwards your hand.
![]() |
Replica at left, master Singer at right. |
It is also worth noting that the replicas are slightly taller (in the orientation pictured below), which way the bobbin winder ofttimes does non contact them correctly since they sit down a tad further out.
![]() |
Replica at left, master Singer at right. |
If y'all receive got a Singer amongst a spoked handwheel of the 5.5" variety, y'all may wonder how y'all tin say if it's a replica or original. If y'all popular it off the machine, it volition receive got SIMANCO stamped on the back.
The replica but features crude oil metallic on the back.
However, Singer also made a larger spoked handwheel that does non receive got SIMANCO stamped on it, below:
![]() |
Original Singer 6" |
This ane is off of a model 66 made sometime inwards the early on 1900s, together with it's a combat larger at half dozen inches inwards diameter. You'll also notice it exclusively has half dozen outer spokes.
It's the heaviest of the 3 featured here, weighing inwards at two lbs. four ozs.
Since it's an master Singer part, the bore is perfectly centered.
You may take away heed that the spoked handwheel off of ane Singer machine volition non fit another. Here's why. Look at the bored-out centre shaft on the Singer 5.5":
![]() |
5.5" handwheel |
Now await at the bored-out centre shaft on the Singer 6":
![]() |
6" handwheel |
As y'all tin see, the latter has a taller, or longer, shaft. That's because it rides on a longer bushing. The bushing is the business office y'all run across pictured below. It's a sort of flanged metallic sleeve that fits over the actual shaft of the machine, together with serves equally the coupling for the handwheel.
![]() |
5.5" at left, 6" at right, each amongst their respective bushing. |
To provide approximately to a greater extent than clarity, hither is what the bare shaft of a machine looks like:
Here is what the shaft of a machine looks similar amongst a bushing mounted on it:
Getting these bushings on together with off is non easy, but it is doable amongst the right tools. I'll laid upwardly a tutorial for a futurity entry inwards illustration whatever of y'all would similar to tackle this.